Skip to content
99 Park Row - Insights from LexBlog on all things digital publishing

Menu

AboutSubscribe
Coronavirus Legal Daily logo
Join CLD
Search
Close

HHS Issues Guidance on Provider Use of Audio-Only Telehealth

By Mary Connolly on June 17, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On June 13, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued guidance to explain how audio-only telehealth can comply with HIPAA, while also emphasizing that this mode of telehealth services can expand healthcare access to individuals who may have limited internet and broadband capabilities.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, HHS’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) published a Notification of Enforcement Discretion for Telehealth Remote Communications which permitted providers to use any available non-public facing remote technologies to provide telehealth services, even when those technologies may not fully comply with HIPAA. Notably, OCR may begin to impose penalties for non-compliant technologies once the public health emergency (PHE) declaration expires. The PHE is currently in place through mid-July.

The new HHS guidance clarifies that while HIPAA covered entities can use remote communication technologies to provide telehealth services (including audio-only services), compliance with the HIPAA Privacy Rule requires applying reasonable safeguards to protect the privacy of protected health information (PHI) from impermissible uses or disclosures. OCR expects covered healthcare providers to provide telehealth services in a private setting; if that is not feasible, covered providers must implement safeguards like using lowered voices and not using a speakerphone in order to limit incidental disclosures of PHI. Meanwhile, the HIPAA Security Rule—which applies to electronic PHI (ePHI)—does not apply to telehealth services provided by using a traditional landline because the information transmitted is not electronic. Covered entities using telephone systems that transmit ePHI, such as Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), need to apply appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and security of the information.

Lastly, if a telecommunications service provider is not creating, receiving, or maintaining PHI on behalf of the covered entity—and is merely acting as a conduit—a business associate agreement (BAA) is not needed. Conversely, if the vendor is more than a conduit for transmission of PHI (such as a developer of a smartphone app), it is considered a business associate and a BAA should be in place.

Sign up to receive Rivkin Rounds at www.RivkinRounds.com.

  • Blog:
    Rivkin Rounds
  • Organization:
    Rivkin Radler
  • Article: View Original Source

Coronavirus Legal Daily logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Publishing Solutions
LexBlog.com
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service

About this Publication

The coronavirus pandemic presents a global challenge unlike any we’ve ever seen. In response, we’ve seen lawyers rise to the occasion with updates and analysis on the many impacts of the COVID-19 virus. With Coronavirus Legal daily, we gather it all into place.

Read more
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo